Welcome To Evolution Sucks!
Welcome to Evolution Sucks
Welcome to my new Evolution Sucks Blog. A companion to my www.evolutionsucks.org website currently ranked #1 on page 1 of both Google and Yahoo Search using the key phrase "Evolution Sucks"
The purpose of Evolution Sucks is to get people to take a step back from the scientific dogma that has been force fed them in regards to the subject of origins.
I myself am a 49 year old man, married father of 3. I am a young earth creationist. I look forward to civil and lively discussions about my website and the subject of origins.
Welcome and let the debate begin.
posted by dougp59 @ 4:25 PM
6 Comments:
Just wondering - there are "six (6) questions" presented as:
**"Alright, here is the deal, go through the questions one by one with an open mind. When you are done, explore the links under the "Now What?" section."**
...ok...I've gone thru the questions with an open mind....WHY(?) is there no RESPONSE FORMAT, whereby the humble viewer, who has been presented with such thought provoking information,CANNOT offer his, or her OWN THOUGHTS on the presented info, or possibly ask for further information, or proof??
OOPS - I forgot to mention, your "Question #2" is missing altogether....
Well, the answer is that I am not an HTML or DHTML or Java coding genius!
So, hence the BLOG which allows you to post questions/rebuttals.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Science is not based on "belief" or "dogma". Science is based on emperical evidence, repeatable experimentation, and careful observation.
The scientific definition of the word "theory" does not mean "guess" or "unproven hypothesis". It means carefully detailed and mostly proven working framework in which to describe a natural phenomenon.
There are dozens of examples of "transitional" fossils, but possibly not just for the two or three specific questions you posited. Archaeopteryx? Hello? Please try looking up archaeopteryx, only the most famous "transitional" fossil, but certainly no tthe only transitional fossil.
Decrease in size over the course of evolution (dinosaurs to birds) or loss of feet and hooves (land creatures to whales) does not disprove evolution and frankly, is a stupid couple of questions. (Not that all of your questions aren't stupid)
I don't know why I'm wasting my time. It is clear that the ones with closed minds are creationists, not scientists. But the irony is that those with closed minds cannot see themselves for what they are.
It is reasonable and appropriate to question the conclusions drawn from observation and analysis.
It is quite another thing to argue that any phenomenon that has not been exhaustively documented and explained must therefore be the product of magic or supernatural forces.
If it is important to you to develop a deeper understanding of living things' adaptation to their environment over the course of many generations, collect data, learn from the hard work, scholarship, and mistakes of others, and contribute something to mankind's knowledge of nature.
all adaptions lose genetic information.
is that how evolution works now-a days?
Post a Comment
<< Home